Archetypal Images and Media Imaginary: potential and limitations of superheroic Great Mothers.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v16i15%20(S).1111Abstract
This contribution falls within the field of cultural studies on media narratives, which are addressed from an original and still underexplored perspective. Cultural studies have typically examined how the media imaginary is shaped by hegemonic rhetorics, reproducing inequalities and rendering marginalized subjects and claims invisible. Within this framework, feminist cultural studies have analyzed representations of female agency across different media genres, which today are strongly influenced by postfeminist and neoliberal rhetorics. We propose to integrate the perspective of the archetype into the critical analysis of media narratives, as it allows for a deeper understanding of their symbolic efficacy—that is, their capacity to symbolically nourish the experiences of their audiences. Archetypal images are indeed powerful symbols, as they reveal the affective link between the embodied and “lived” symbol, and the symbol as represented in the collective imaginary.
The study is based on a textual analysis of female superhero figures that may constitute contemporary actualizations of the archetypal images of the Great Mother within a transmedia corpus of North American superhero comics and films. The research question addresses the potentials and the limitations of these representations of female power and agency. The analysis first discusses how the superhero universe has ambiguously reconfigured female power, which is acknowledged yet continuously constrained within contemporary narratives; second, it shows that even a particularly challenging figure, such as the Dark Phoenix, fails to offer a significantly alternative imaginary of female power, thus highlighting persistent symbolic limitations even in current media representations regarded as progressive.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Roberta Bartoletti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
(APC) Article and submissions processing charges
ISR does not ask for articles and submissions processing charges APC
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following points:
- Authors retain the rights to their work and give to the journal the right of first publication of the work, simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons License. This attribution allows others to share the work, indicating the authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The authors may enter into other agreements with non-exclusive license to distribute the published version of the work (eg. deposit it in an institutional archive or publish it in a monograph), provided to indicate that the document was first published in this journal.
- Authors can distribute their work online (eg. on their website) only after the article is published (See The Effect of Open Access).
Peer Reviewed Journal - ISSN 2239-8589